Burnstack logo

Burnstack

Cost visibility for founders, ops, and platform teams

Stop guessing at infra costs.See spend, code, and architecture in one place.

Burnstack combines provider spend, GitHub repos, Terraform directories, and platform metadata into a provider-agnostic system graph so AI can suggest cost savings with real infrastructure context.

Start with spend tracking, then layer in repos, Terraform, and AI analysis

8+

Supported integrations

1 source

Unified spend timeline

RLS

Workspace isolation

Burnstack Overview

Monthly Burn Momentum

Live Preview

This month

$11.2k

MoM

+20.4%

Providers

8

$11.2K$7.4K$3.7K$0SepOctNovDecJanFeb

Top moving category

AI models spend increased with traffic growth. Drill into provider runs to confirm.

Operator workflow

Check runs, verify mappings, then share one number in the weekly ops review.

Integrations

Connect 8+ providers to unify cloud, AI, and SaaS cost signals

GitHub

Google Cloud

Anthropic

Supabase

Tavily

OpenAI

OpenRouter

Vercel

Problem

Infrastructure spend gets fragmented across providers and disconnected from your actual architecture.

Founders and platform teams can usually see billing totals, but not a project-architecture view across repos, Infrastructure as Code, and deployments. That makes it hard to analyze where money is going and why.

Spend is spread across too many systems

Cloud, AI, and SaaS invoices land in different portals, so teams see the cost symptom but not the system architecture causing it.

Infrastructure intent lives in code, not billing dashboards

Terraform, app repos, and platform config explain what is wired to what, but most cost tools never read the codebase.

Project attribution is inconsistent

Teams need project-level views, but raw invoices rarely map cleanly to repos, environments, and services the engineering team actually owns.

Solution

A cost command center with infrastructure context, not just billing totals.

Burnstack combines spend visibility with code and platform inputs so teams can understand how systems are wired and where optimization work will actually matter.

Unified provider ingestion

Connect providers once and normalize costs into a single timeline with workspace-scoped access controls.

Ingestion
OpenAI usage pullhealthy2m ago
Vercel charges syncqueuednow
Supabase billing importsynced1m ago

Project-aware cost views

Organize costs around projects, repos, and environments so infra and finance are looking at the same operating units.

Projects
API platformmapped12 entries
AI copilotsmapped4 providers
Internal opsreview2 uncategorized

Infrastructure graph inputs

Register GitHub repos, Terraform directories, and platform links (like Vercel) to build a system graph from code and deployment metadata.

Graph inputs
github.com/acme/platformrepolinked
/infra/terraform/prodterraformanalyze
vercel: web-appplatformlinked

AI guidance with architecture context

Use AI to explain spend drivers and suggest savings opportunities based on what Terraform and platform metadata show is actually connected.

AI findings
NAT gateway duplicationcostreview
gp2 -> gp3 migrationsavings~$180/mo
Idle non-prod resourcesaiflagged

Infrastructure + AI

Infrastructure as Code + Repo analysis with AI on top

Burnstack is moving beyond spend dashboards: connect repos, register Terraform paths, build a system graph, and use AI to prioritize savings and architecture improvements.

How the workflow fits together

Provider APIs tell us what exists. Code and Terraform tell us how it is wired.

01

Connect repos per project

Install the GitHub App once, then assign specific repos to each project so the graph reflects how your teams actually ship.

02

Point to Terraform directories

Register Terraform or Terragrunt paths (Infrastructure as Code) so Burnstack can parse modules, resources, providers, and references.

03

Build a system graph

Combine provider metadata, platform links, and code-derived signals into a provider-agnostic graph with confidence and provenance.

04

Get AI cost guidance

AI reads the graph plus spend trends to suggest savings, architectural improvements, and tradeoffs with evidence-backed context.

Infrastructure as Code + Repo + AI outputs

Infrastructure as Code and repo-driven inputs on a provider-agnostic graph foundation for broader infrastructure support.

Terraform modules/resources

Parsed into graph nodes and references

Vercel + platform links

Connected to deployments and environments

GitHub commits/webhooks

Trigger graph snapshot updates

AI recommendations

Savings + architecture guidance with context

Example AI findings: overprovisioned resources, storage class upgrades, idle non-prod infra, and architecture patterns that drive unnecessary spend.

How It Works

Three steps to get a usable baseline, then go deeper

Start with spend visibility first, then add repo and Terraform analysis as your team wants more infrastructure context.

01

Connect workspace + providers

Sign in, provision your workspace, and connect provider spend sources so you have a baseline before deeper infra analysis.

02

Link repos and Terraform paths

Assign GitHub repos to projects and specify Terraform directories Burnstack should analyze for architecture and cost context.

03

Analyze graph + act on AI findings

Use the Infrastructure view to build a system graph, inspect relationships, and review AI suggestions on how to save money.

Features

Cost visibility plus infrastructure-aware analysis

Burnstack starts with spend operations and expands into Terraform-aware system graph analysis and AI guidance.

Workspace-scoped access

Auth + membership checks keep dashboards and data isolated by tenant.

Provider coverage

8+ integrations available today, with manual entry fallback.

Projects foundation

Map spend, repos, and infrastructure graph inputs to the same project structure your team already uses.

Infrastructure graph foundation

Ingestion runs and timestamps help ops diagnose missing or delayed data quickly.

Terraform + AI cost guidance

Use IaC-aware analysis to explain spend drivers and generate infrastructure savings suggestions with better context.

Pricing

Choose the plan that matches your infra cost workflow

Start free for daily sync visibility, then upgrade when you need on-demand syncs and scheduling controls.

Toggle pricing for the Team plan. Basic and Enterprise stay the same.

Basic

$0

For solo founders getting visibility into infrastructure spend

1 project

Daily automated syncs

Core dashboard + provider spend visibility

No on-demand syncs

No Repo analysis

No infrastructure analysis

Popular

Team

$6/mo

Billed annually

For teams that need faster refreshes and collaboration

10 projects

On-demand syncs

Custom sync scheduling

Repo + infrastructure analysis

Workspace roles

Enterprise

Custom

For larger orgs that need governance and custom rollout support

Unlimited projects

Custom rollout + controls

Priority support

Custom sync policies

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Questions teams ask before connecting provider spend, repos, and Terraform for infrastructure cost analysis.

What do I need before using Burnstack?+

For the full product experience you need Supabase configured (URL, anon key, site URL, and encryption key) plus the SQL migrations applied. The marketing page and login page can exist before that.

Can we start without integrating every provider?+

Yes. Burnstack supports manual entries so teams can establish a baseline immediately and add provider integrations as they go.

Do we need Terraform to use Burnstack?+

No. Burnstack still works for provider spend tracking without Terraform. Terraform support adds deeper architecture context for graph analysis and AI recommendations.

How does the AI use our infrastructure code?+

Burnstack is designed to parse infrastructure and platform signals first (Terraform directories, repo metadata, deployments) and use AI on top of that normalized graph to explain risks and suggest savings.

How is data access scoped?+

Access is workspace-scoped with membership-based authorization, and the app is designed around tenant isolation with row-level protections in Supabase.

Do you support project-level cost views?+

Yes. The app includes project foundations and integration project mapping so you can track costs in the same structure used by your team.

Which providers can I connect today?+

Burnstack currently supports GitHub, Google Cloud, Anthropic, Supabase, Tavily, OpenAI, OpenRouter, Vercel.

How quickly can a startup get value from this?+

Most teams can set up auth, create a workspace, add a first data source, and get an initial spend baseline in a single session. Repo + Terraform analysis can be layered on after that.

Ready to get started?

Start your infra cost baseline this week.

Configure Supabase, connect your first provider, then add GitHub + Terraform paths when you are ready for infrastructure graph analysis and AI savings guidance.